#Undertale soulless full#

#Undertale soulless full#

Theyre not really worth it because the only change is at the very, very end of the game, after all the. Both Soulless Pacifist Endings YouTubespoilers Both Soulless Pacifist Endings - Undertale - YouTubeUNDERTALE soulless pacifist full gameIt was you who led. However, there is a slight problem with my logic. It basically just ruins the two pacifist endings. She would move on to the humans instead with her load/save powers.Ģ. Not sure if anything happens when you do three Genocide Runs in a row. It would be humanity that she would be after. If you do two Genocide Runs in a row some of the first human's dialogue will change at the end ( basically they say they no longer comprehend your motives, and suggest a different path be taken next playthrough ). It would be not only pointless but why would she do that? She hates humanity. If we were to theorize about soulless, the main cast would be alive because Chara already killed them before. Did the protagonist just give everyone a letter and they were just reading off of it?ģ. Well…unless it was the protagonist that asked the question…that would be weird after the way everyone was talking. However, based on Toriel and Sans’ answer to the question, I’m starting to believe the protagonist chose the “I have places to go.” option mainly because they never mention the protagonist despite both living with each other apparently. I’m willing to bet the creator made that ambiguous enough for all True and Soulless endings mainly because none of the answers mention the protagonist in any way shape or form. I’m going to answer the third and second question out of order to better explain what I’m saying.ġ. What are your thoughts? Is my logic off in some way? Leave your opinions below. Not to mention when Chara is control, she still keeps that a secret to everyone including Flowey after making those markings on the drawing. This supports that “Frisk” is a manufactured name Chara made up and Flowey always knew that the protagonist is Chara. Chara taking our SOUL does absolutely nothing! Flowey looks straight at us and still refers to us as Chara which means absolutely nothing changes when it comes to our appearance or the way we approach Flowey. Chara did not kill anyone…well, before talking to Flowey. Also, Flowey was talking to Chara through the player. Flowey giving that same speech while Chara takes control in soulless pacifist ending means that Chara and the player are still fused together in both soulless and true pacifist routes endings. However, if this is true, it proves several things.

I’m not fully certain if this happens because I only see several people saying it happens and see no videos on this. I mean how can everyone be happy if Chara went full genocide mode on them? Not to mention, Chara didn’t attempt anything on Flowey during that speech. Those red markings on the photo suggest bad stuff happens but if Flowey gave that same speech in the post genocide route, that means Chara doesn’t really do anything…Well, at least before Flowey’s dialogue and after the markings. Clearly, Flowey went up to check before he said the first sentence. Peace and Prosperity will rule across the land.